home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Turnbull China Bikeride / Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso / BARNET / ARMLINUX / MAIL / 9710 / 000082_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Sat Oct 18 16:21:47 1997.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1997-11-30  |  2KB

  1. Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
  2. Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
  3.     by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA13132
  4.     for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:21:46 +0100
  5. Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 383]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <1921-3988>; Sat, 18 Oct1997 18:21:30 +0300
  6. Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <973088-404>; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 11:18:32 -0400
  7. Received: from lenzie.cent.gla.ac.uk ([130.209.34.18] EHLO lenzie.cent.gla.ac.uk ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 33956]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <973085-404>; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 11:18:02 -0400
  8. Received: from localhost (9606585c@localhost sender 9606585c) by lenzie.cent.gla.ac.uk (8.8.4/UK-2.2a/cent-sparc) with SMTP id QAA15637; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:19:55 +0100 (BST)
  9. Date:     Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:19:55 +0100 (BST)
  10. From: James Craig <9606585c@udcf.gla.ac.uk>
  11. X-Sender: 9606585c@lenzie.cent.gla.ac.uk
  12. To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin <rmk@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
  13. cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  14. Subject: Re: pipex
  15. In-Reply-To: <199710180849.JAA00406@raistlin.armlinux.org>
  16. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971018161849.15217A-100000@lenzie.cent.gla.ac.uk>
  17. MIME-Version: 1.0
  18. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
  19. X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  20. Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  21. Precedence: bulk
  22. Status: RO
  23.  
  24. I just got an email like that, one apparently from yourself, and another
  25. from the mailing list.
  26. I'm *not* using any of the dodgy 'mailers or anything - I'm using PINE, on
  27. UNIX, so I think we can rule that one out.
  28. Not good anyway...
  29. -- James Craig <jcraig@mad.scientist.com>
  30.